Heat sink performance is decided before the first extrusion runs: by fin geometry, alloy conductivity, base thickness and how the air actually moves. This guide gives engineers the working design numbers, the extrusion limits you cannot design around, and the RFQ checklist we use with overseas buyers.
Start With Thermal Resistance, Not Fin Count
Every heat sink project should begin with the number the design has to hit: the allowable sink-to-ambient thermal resistance, usually written as θsa in °C/W. Work it backwards from the device:
θsa = (T junction max − T ambient) / Q − θjc − θinterface
where Q is the dissipated power in watts. Say a 100 W module must hold junction temperature below 100 °C in 40 °C ambient air, with θjc of 0.1 °C/W and a thermal paste interface of 0.08 °C/W. That leaves only about 0.42 °C/W of headroom for the sink itself. Once that number is on the table, fin count becomes a calculation rather than an opinion.
Alloy: 6063 Is the Default, 6061 Is the Exception
Thermal conductivity decides how fast heat travels from the base into the fins.
| Alloy | Thermal conductivity (W/m·K) | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| 6063-T5 / T6 | ~200–218 | Standard extrusion alloy: best conductivity in the 6xxx family, best as-extruded finish for anodizing |
| 6061-T6 | ~167–180 | Roughly 29% stronger than 6063, about 20% less conductive — use when the sink also carries structural load |
| 1050 / 1100 (pure) | ~222–231 | Highest conductivity of the common aluminums; soft, used for skived or stamped fins |
| A380 / ADC12 (die cast) | ~96–105 | Workhorse casting alloys, roughly half the conductivity of 6063 |
| Copper C11000 | ~385–400 | Best conductor, 3.3× heavier and far costlier per kilogram |
Rule of thumb: 6063 for extruded heat sinks, 6061 when strength or machining demands it, die casting when you need 3D geometry rather than peak conduction.
Fin Geometry: Four Numbers Decide Performance
Fin pitch, fin thickness, fin height and base thickness all interact, and the airflow mode sets the starting point.
| Parameter | Natural convection | Forced air, 1–2 m/s | Forced air, 3–5 m/s |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fin-to-fin gap | 6–10 mm | 3–5 mm | 2–3.5 mm |
| Fin thickness | 1.5–3 mm | 1.5–2.5 mm | 1.2–2 mm |
| Fin height | 25–50 mm | 15–35 mm | 10–25 mm |
| Convective coefficient | 5–10 W/m²K | 15–40 W/m²K | 40–90 W/m²K |
Why wide gaps in still air: the boundary layer growing on each fin reaches roughly 4–6 mm. Space fins tighter than that and the layers merge, the channel goes stagnant, and the inner fin area stops working — the sink behaves like a solid block of metal. Dense fins only pay off when air is actively pushed through them.
Fin height follows the same logic. Fin efficiency drops as fins get taller, because the tip runs close to ambient temperature and contributes less and less: about 95% at 10 mm, 90–95% at 25 mm and 85–90% at 50 mm. Beyond 40–60 mm in natural convection, extra height buys very little compared with added base area.
Base Thickness and Heat Spreading
A thin base under a small heat source is the classic constriction problem: heat cannot spread sideways fast enough and much of the fin array never sees it. For a 40 × 40 mm source, 6–8 mm of base spreads heat well. Below about 5 mm, constriction resistance can add 15–20% to the total; above roughly 10 mm the gain is a few percent while weight and material cost keep climbing.
Extrusion Limits You Cannot Design Around
Extruded profiles give the lowest cost per watt dissipated, but the die sets hard limits:
- Minimum fin thickness is roughly 1.0–1.3 mm in 6063. Thinner fins, and taller aspect ratios, wear or break the die.
- Practical fin aspect ratio (height divided by thickness) runs up to about 8:1 on a standard die, and up to 10:1–12:1 with a dedicated die.
- Fin height is typically 10–50 mm. Taller fins need slower press speeds and can add 20–30% to unit cost.
- Spacing tolerance is about ±0.15 mm on extrusions, against about ±0.05 mm on skived or CNC-machined fins.
If the thermal budget really needs 0.5 mm fins on 1.5 mm pitch, that is a skived or forged part, not an extrusion — better to know before the tooling is cut.
Extrusion vs Die Casting vs Skiving
| Method | Minimum fin thickness | Fin aspect ratio | Tolerance | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extrusion (6063) | ~1.0–1.3 mm | up to ~12:1 | ±0.15–0.20 mm | Straight fins, high volume, best cost per watt |
| Die casting (A380 / ADC12) | ~1.5 mm, with draft | ~3–5:1 | ±0.30 mm | Complex 3D fins, bosses and housing in one part |
| Skived from solid block | ~0.5 mm | up to ~20:1 | ±0.05–0.08 mm | High heat flux, dense fins, higher cost |
| CNC machined | ~0.8–1.0 mm | medium | ±0.05 mm | Prototypes, low volume, tight interfaces |
Interface, Finish and Orientation
- The interface matters as much as the sink. A thin thermal paste layer (about 0.1 mm) outperforms a 1 mm gap pad, and bare machined contact is the worst case. If the thermal budget is tight, specify flatness around 0.05 mm and Ra 1.6 µm on the mating face.
- Black anodizing lifts emissivity from roughly 0.08 to 0.85, worth about 10–15% extra dissipation in natural convection at higher temperatures, and it protects the fins. Clear anodizing protects the surface but adds little radiation.
- In still air, fins must run vertically so air enters low and leaves high; mounting the same sink with fins horizontal typically costs 20–30%. In forced air, send the flow along the fin channels, not across them, and leave at least one fin pitch of clearance at inlet and outlet.
What to Put in the RFQ
Send these seven items for a first-time-right quotation:
- Power to dissipate (W) and maximum base temperature, or the θsa target in °C/W.
- Cooling mode: natural convection, or airflow velocity and fan static pressure.
- Envelope length × width × height, and whether height is capped by the enclosure.
- Alloy and temper — 6063-T5 is our default — and whether the sink carries structural load.
- Fin geometry if you have it, or the thermal target and we will propose the geometry.
- Base flatness and Ra, interface details, hole pattern, thread sizes and torque.
- Quantity, finish (mill, clear or black anodized, powder coated) and annual volume.
Why Buyers Work With SYHARVEST
SYHARVEST Aluminium operates 8 extrusion presses from 660 t to 3600/4000 t, covering billet diameters of 90–254 mm and a maximum circumscribed circle of about 320 mm, in 6063, 6061 and 6005. We extrude, cut, machine on 8 CNC centers and finish in-house on a horizontal anodizing line, a vertical powder coating line and optional electrophoresis. Lead times are typically 5–7 days for billet-only profiles, around 12 days with surface treatment, and 15–18 days with CNC machining.
Send your drawing or your thermal target and our engineers will come back with a fin geometry proposal, a weight estimate and a price. Request a quote at www.syharvest.com/quote.html.
Interested in Our Products?
Contact us today for a professional quotation tailored to your requirements.
Get a Free Quote